Effect of Extending the Original Eligibility Criteria for the CROSS Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Toxicity and Survival in Esophageal Cancer

Patients with curable esophageal cancer (EC) who proceed beyond the original Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) eligibility criteria are also treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study assessed the effect that extending the CROSS eligibility criteria for nCRT has on treatment-related toxicity and overall survival (OS) in EC. The study enrolled 161 patients with locally advanced EC (T1N1-3/T2-4aN0-3/M0) treated with the CROSS schedule followed by esophagectomy. Group 1 consisted of 89 patients who met the CROSS criteria, and group 2 consisted of 72 patients who met the extended eligibility criteria, i.e. a tumor length greater than 8 cm (n = 24), more than 10% weight loss (n = 35), more than 2-4 cm extension in the stomach (n = 21), celiac lymph node metastasis (n = 13), and/or age over 75 years (n = 2). The study assessed the differences in nCRT-associated toxicity [National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade3] and 90-day postoperative mortality. Moreover, the prognostic value for OS was assessed with multivariate Cox regression analysis. No difference was found in nCRT-associated toxicity (P = 0.117), postoperative complications (P = 0.783), and 90-day mortality (P = 0.492). The OS differed significantly (P = 0.004), with a median of 37.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4-64.2 months] for group 1 and 17.2 months (95% CI 13.8-20.7 months) for group 2. Pathologic N stage (P = 0.023), pathologic T stage (P = 0.043), and group 2 (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Extension of the CROSS study eligibility criteria for nCRT did not affect nCRT-associated toxicity, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality, but was prognostic for OS

ABCD Neurocognitive Prediction Challenge 2019: Predicting individual residual fluid intelligence scores from cortical grey matter morphology

We predicted residual fluid intelligence scores from T1-weighted MRI data available as part of the ABCD NP Challenge 2019, using morphological similarity of grey-matter regions across the cortex. Individual structural covariance networks (SCN) were abstracted into graph-theory metrics averaged over nodes across the brain and in data-driven communities/modules. Metrics included degree, path length, clustering coefficient, centrality, rich club coefficient, and small-worldness. These features derived from the training set were used to build various regression models for predicting residual fluid intelligence scores, with performance evaluated both using cross-validation within the training set and using the held-out validation set. Our predictions on the test set were generated with a support vector regression model trained on the training set. We found minimal improvement over predicting a zero residual fluid intelligence score across the sample population, implying that structural covariance networks calculated from T1-weighted MR imaging data provide little information about residual fluid intelligence.Comment: 8 pages plus references, 3 figures, 2 tables. Submission to the ABCD Neurocognitive Prediction Challenge at MICCAI 201

Complaints and complications associated with removal of the mandibular third molar. A prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar and to evaluate the influence of this procedure on functioning of the patient during the first post-surgical week. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical. SETTING: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Groningen. METHODS: Patients referred for removal of a mandibular third molar were asked to return one week after the procedure and to keep a daily record of the use of pain medication, duration of the pain and intensity of the pain. RESULTS: Removal of mandibular third molars resulted in an overall complication rate of 12%. Pain medication was used more frequently and for a longer period by patients with post-surgical complications. Due to complaints following the removal of the mandibular third molar, the mean absence from work was one and a half day. Work was generally resumed with decreased perceived efficiency. CONCLUSION: After this commonly performed procedure in dento-alveolar surgery most of the patients were hampered as a result of pain during the first four post-surgical days. Over 10% of the patients developed complications leading to more frequently and prolonged use of pain medication. Removal of the mandibular third molar gave rise to complaints which influenced the patients relatively strong in their daily functioning.</p

Complaints and complications associated with removal of the mandibular third molar. A prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar and to evaluate the influence of this procedure on functioning of the patient during the first post-surgical week. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical. SETTING: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Groningen. METHODS: Patients referred for removal of a mandibular third molar were asked to return one week after the procedure and to keep a daily record of the use of pain medication, duration of the pain and intensity of the pain. RESULTS: Removal of mandibular third molars resulted in an overall complication rate of 12%. Pain medication was used more frequently and for a longer period by patients with post-surgical complications. Due to complaints following the removal of the mandibular third molar, the mean absence from work was one and a half day. Work was generally resumed with decreased perceived efficiency. CONCLUSION: After this commonly performed procedure in dento-alveolar surgery most of the patients were hampered as a result of pain during the first four post-surgical days. Over 10% of the patients developed complications leading to more frequently and prolonged use of pain medication. Removal of the mandibular third molar gave rise to complaints which influenced the patients relatively strong in their daily functioning.</p

Effect of Extending the Original CROSS Criteria on Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer Patients:A National Multicenter Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND: Extending the original criteria of the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) in daily practice may increase the treatment outcome of esophageal cancer (EC) patients. This retrospective national cohort study assessed the impact on the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and surgical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from EC patients treated between 2009 and 2017 were collected from the national Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit database. Patients had locally advanced EC (cT1/N+ or cT2-4a/N0-3/M0) and were treated according to the CROSS regimen. CROSS (n = 1942) and the extended CROSS (e-CROSS; n = 1359) represent patients fulfilling the original or extended CROSS criteria, respectively. The primary outcome was total pCR (ypT0N0), while secondary outcomes were local esophageal pCR (ypT0), surgical radicality, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Overall, CROSS and e-CROSS did not differ in total or local pCR rate, although a trend was observed (23.2% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.052; and 26.7% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.061). When stratifying by histology, the pCR rate was higher in the CROSS group compared with e-CROSS in squamous cell carcinomas (48.2% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.000) but not in adenocarcinomas (16.8% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.908). Surgical radicality did not differ between groups. Postoperative mortality (3.2% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.037) and morbidity (58.3% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.048) were higher in e-CROSS. CONCLUSION: Extending the CROSS inclusion criteria for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in routine clinical practice of EC patients had no impact on the pCR rate and on radicality, but was associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. Importantly, effects differed between histological subtypes. Hence, in future studies, we should carefully reconsider who will benefit most in the real-world setting

Complaints and complications associated with removal of the mandibular third molar. A prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar and to evaluate the influence of this procedure on functioning of the patient during the first post-surgical week. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical. SETTING: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Groningen. METHODS: Patients referred for removal of a mandibular third molar were asked to return one week after the procedure and to keep a daily record of the use of pain medication, duration of the pain and intensity of the pain. RESULTS: Removal of mandibular third molars resulted in an overall complication rate of 12%. Pain medication was used more frequently and for a longer period by patients with post-surgical complications. Due to complaints following the removal of the mandibular third molar, the mean absence from work was one and a half day. Work was generally resumed with decreased perceived efficiency. CONCLUSION: After this commonly performed procedure in dento-alveolar surgery most of the patients were hampered as a result of pain during the first four post-surgical days. Over 10% of the patients developed complications leading to more frequently and prolonged use of pain medication. Removal of the mandibular third molar gave rise to complaints which influenced the patients relatively strong in their daily functioning.</p

Complaints and complications associated with removal of the mandibular third molar. A prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar and to evaluate the influence of this procedure on functioning of the patient during the first post-surgical week. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical. SETTING: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Groningen. METHODS: Patients referred for removal of a mandibular third molar were asked to return one week after the procedure and to keep a daily record of the use of pain medication, duration of the pain and intensity of the pain. RESULTS: Removal of mandibular third molars resulted in an overall complication rate of 12%. Pain medication was used more frequently and for a longer period by patients with post-surgical complications. Due to complaints following the removal of the mandibular third molar, the mean absence from work was one and a half day. Work was generally resumed with decreased perceived efficiency. CONCLUSION: After this commonly performed procedure in dento-alveolar surgery most of the patients were hampered as a result of pain during the first four post-surgical days. Over 10% of the patients developed complications leading to more frequently and prolonged use of pain medication. Removal of the mandibular third molar gave rise to complaints which influenced the patients relatively strong in their daily functioning.</p

Complaints and complications associated with removal of the mandibular third molar. A prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar and to evaluate the influence of this procedure on functioning of the patient during the first post-surgical week. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical. SETTING: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Groningen. METHODS: Patients referred for removal of a mandibular third molar were asked to return one week after the procedure and to keep a daily record of the use of pain medication, duration of the pain and intensity of the pain. RESULTS: Removal of mandibular third molars resulted in an overall complication rate of 12%. Pain medication was used more frequently and for a longer period by patients with post-surgical complications. Due to complaints following the removal of the mandibular third molar, the mean absence from work was one and a half day. Work was generally resumed with decreased perceived efficiency. CONCLUSION: After this commonly performed procedure in dento-alveolar surgery most of the patients were hampered as a result of pain during the first four post-surgical days. Over 10% of the patients developed complications leading to more frequently and prolonged use of pain medication. Removal of the mandibular third molar gave rise to complaints which influenced the patients relatively strong in their daily functioning.</p